-0 C
Monday, January 27, 2020
Connecting Our Communities

Wellesley to spread cost of septic-system inspections to residents


News Briefs

Woolwich nixes traffic islands Displeased with the troublesome pedestrian islands installed during the Region of Waterloo’s reconstruction of Church Street...

Woolwich proposes 5% tax hike for 2020

Budget talks underway this week, Woolwich council is looking at five per cent hike in property taxes, a...

20-year-old agreement causes a stir

An Elmira environmentalist’s “smoking gun” appears to be shooting blanks. Al Marshall, a long-time critic of cleanup efforts at...

Taking the plunge on condos

Necessity may be the mother of invention, but it’s also a prime reason Woolwich councillors this week approved...


overcast clouds
-0 ° C
1.7 °
-1.7 °
96 %
90 %
-2 °
-3 °
-3 °
-0 °
-2 °

Ratepayers across Wellesley face a small fee increase in each of the next five years to cover the cost of an inspection program that evaluates the health of private septic systems in St. Clements and Linwood, the township deciding protecting drinking water was a common good.

Exploring a number of options, councillors meeting Tuesday decided that some 3,500 properties would be assessed an additional $0.50 per year to inspect the 57 septic systems identified under the Grand River Source Protection Plan.

Under provincial regulations, inspections must be carried out every five years. When the province introduced the measures in 2015, it provided funding to municipalities to cover the cost. For the next cycle, due to start in 2020, there’s currently no outside money to cover the bill of an estimated $8,636.

To fund the program this time around, the township looked at spreading the load across the entire tax base ($0.50 per year), charging water customers in Linwood and St. Clements ($2.23 per year), making each of the 57 property owners pay ($151.51),  or simply absorbing the costs into township expenses.

Staff recommended the village funding option, but council went with the township-wide levy, deeming it fair.

“This model states that the costs would be shared equally across all property owners throughout the township. It would imply that keeping the well aquifers safe from septic contamination benefits all residents within the township,” the report from Darryl Denny says of council’s preferred option.

A decision didn’t come without debate, however, including a discussion about conflict-of-interest rules, as Ward 4 Coun. Carl Smit said that he couldn’t vote because his property is one of the 57 with a septic system.

“I didn’t gain anything by this. I’m going to lose something by this. So I don’t see it as pecuniary gain,” said Smit.

“From my understanding of a conflict of interest… if a member of council is in line or representative of a significant number of residents, then there is no conflict of interest because he’s not representing a personal point of view,” said Ward 3 Coun. Peter van der Maas in response.

As a result, council made a slight amendment of the technical parts of the meeting, where the mover of the council was changed, but the recommendation remained the same.

In setting the rates, the township opted to build in inflationary increases to adjust for rising prices over the course of the program. Costs and the program itself will be re-evaluated by staff before the next round of re-inspections starting in 2026.

The re-inspection program will require property owners to have their septic tanks pumped out and provide verification to the building department, with the average cost in the village for this procedure between $350-400.

Although agreeing to a cost-recovery formula, Mayor Joe Nowak noted that funding could come from other sources, perhaps altering the model again.

“The region had put some money into that last time it had to be done. … From my understanding, the region is considering doing the same thing again this year, but there’s nothing formally decided yet,” said Nowak.

“In January, February, it’s going to come to regional council for approval, so we’ll have to see what the proposal is. There could be some money to help out with that.”

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to The Observer's online community. Pseudonyms are not permitted. By submitting a comment, you accept that The Observer has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner The Observer chooses. Please note that The Observer does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our submission guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.


Catholic teachers join public board on the picket lines

Local Catholic elementary and high school teachers hit the picket lines Tuesday, marching up and down Arthur Street in Elmira as part of a one-day, province-wide strike. It’s not an...

In Print. Online. In Pictures. In Depth.

You obviously love community journalism. Thanks for visiting today. If you have a great local story, let us know.

Job vacancies become harder to fill in the townships

It’s becoming increasingly tough for employers to find the right candidates to fill vacancies, particularly in local and rural areas, says a new report...

Jacks post first loss of 2020, but post wins on either side

A four-game winning streak to start the new year having come to an end Saturday, the Wellesley Applejacks rebounded Tuesday night to post...

Sugar Kings lose for the first time in 2020

A couple of streaks came to an end Sunday as the Elmira Sugar Kings played their lone game of the week: the four...

Water and sewer rates to rise again this year, as Woolwich approves budget

Flush with cash or otherwise, you’ll be paying more again this year for turning on the taps and taking care of business in...
- Advertisement -