-0.8 C
Elmira
Thursday, January 23, 2020
Their View / Opinion

Survey: Canadians less connected than ever to farmers

The new federal minister of agriculture and food is being handed perhaps the most paradoxical portfolio in the country.

Food is one of humans’ most basic needs, right up there with shelter and clothing. Yet in Canada – and, I suspect, most developed nations – most of us don’t have a clue how food is produced, and how it gets from the field to our table.

But there’s hope: many of us want to know more.

New research from the Canadian Centre for Food Integrity, documented in its 2019 Public Trust Research report released earlier this week, shows that 91 per cent of 2,200 Canadians surveyed claim to know nothing, very little or little about modern farming practices.

It’s those practices – particularly farmers’ use of technology – that has people on edge. 

They’re on edge … but they don’t know what about.

Anyone in the food sector who saw those results and didn’t react strongly is missing the severity of this point. It’s easily the most alarming statistic I’ve ever seen related to food production.

Normally, I’d wonder how groups like the food integrity centre could suggest trust can be built between the food sector and public that is so void of basic farming knowledge in the 21st century. 

But the key is this: the research also revealed that people are intrigued by food. They want to know, but they just aren’t seeing or hearing the messages. In fact, the centre’s survey showed that 60 per cent of respondents say they want to know more about where their food comes from and how it’s produced.

So, they’re not ready to throw in the towel. But given the new survey findings, their lack of understanding needs to be addressed yesterday. Today is already too late and tomorrow is out of the question. Not knowing about food is translating into fear, such as the general suspicion many people feel about genetically modified crops, one of modern farmers’ most significant ways of using technology in the field. And fearing your own food system is a lousy way to wake up in the morning – not only for consumers, but for farmers, too.

So there’s the challenge being laid before the new agriculture and food minister – try to restore faith in the system and in farmers’ use of modern practices. The overwhelming majority of those practices are meant to produce safe, wholesome food in a cost-effective manner.

That’s not to say the minister won’t be facing an avalanche of other extremely pressing issues, including poor harvests in many parts of the country, trade issues that are stifling incomes and now the railway strike that has stalled grain and oilseed movement. No wonder mental health issues are so prevalent among farmers.

But what kind of support can the agricultural industry expect the minister to get from other Members of Parliament if their constituents don’t understand farming? It’s going to take millions upon millions of dollars to help the industry through these extremely tough times. It’s also going to take huge sums to move the public perception needle even a hair.

Everyone will need to work together and commit resources to fixing the short-term and long-term problems. The knowledge Canadians crave about agriculture will be vital, so they’ll understanding what they’re supporting when they’re asked to step up to the plate. They can’t be blamed for not knowing what’s going on in modern farmers’ fields if no one tells them.

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to The Observer's online community. Pseudonyms are not permitted. By submitting a comment, you accept that The Observer has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner The Observer chooses. Please note that The Observer does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our submission guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

We're looking for opinions that count.

Yours. Join in the conversation, provide another viewpoint, change minds with your perspective.

OUR COLUMNISTS

Ongoing privacy woes continue to threaten democracy

Reports about growing threats to our privacy, democracy and very freedom are common. So too is the lack of response from government, which does...

Spending on transit, bike lanes unlikely to pay any dividends

There’s an “if you build it, they will come” mentality to both transit and so-called active transportation (walking, biking) schemes in Waterloo Region. That’s...

Putin the immortal? Probably not

Five years ago somebody posted photographs on the internet showing a man who looked a lot like Vladimir Putin in photographs from 1920...

Downed planes are collateral damage

One of the main causes of death for airline passengers in recent decades is being shot down by somebody’s military. Not the very...

Broadband and bridges, all in the same breath

It’s never been hard to convince rural Ontarians of the value of investing in capital infrastructure. They understand the need for the likes of...

So what’s wrong with a $4 turkey?

Afriend of mine – let’s call her Tara, because that’s her name – visited relatives in Michigan over the Christmas holidays, and noticed the...

Taking a closer look at pike flies then and now

Over the past week or so, I’ve been dreaming of spring and open water, and tying pike flies. If there...

Think of posterity and posteriors when tying flies

This week, I have been making an effort to tie at least one pike fly every day so that when the spring season...

Espionage can be really crappy work

Q.  Based on the most comprehensive inventory of North American birds ever done, their population is A. increasing slightly  B. remaining steady  C....

That you have a phone number can be traced to the measles

Q.  How did an epidemic of measles lead to the introduction of phone numbers? A.  At one time, all phone calls...
- Advertisement -