1.3 C
Wednesday, January 22, 2020
Their View / Opinion

The electorate needs to know farmers are also pro-environment

In these early days after the federal election, there’s a continuous line of fingers wagging at Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, telling him he has to work harder than ever to govern Canada with his Liberal minority.

I’m sure he understands that. In fact, following his victory on election night, he told Western Canada he’s heard its frustrations and he wants to be there to support it.

But how he’ll do that is a huge question.

Western Canadians are spitting mad about the election results and feel alienated. A poll by Environics shows more than 70 per cent of Albertans don’t think their province is treated with the respect it deserves, and that’s about 35 per cent higher than the the national average.

I understand their feelings. I lived in Alberta in the 1980s, when western separatism was taking root.

Back then, the West felt Ottawa was stealing Alberta and Saskatchewan oil and gas (if indeed oil can belong to a province), via the doomed National Energy Program under then prime minister Pierre Trudeau.

Now Justin is a target, thanks to his pro-environment platform. That includes the federal carbon tax and what the west considers a lack of support for pipelines to get prairie oil and gas to markets.

But now, Trudeau haters – along with every farmer in Canada, the majority of whom support the Conservatives – need to look at the campaign position the Liberals think got them elected and gavemore prominence to the Green Party and the NDP – that is, Canadians’ concerns about changing climate.

This was a clear policy distinction between the hand-wringing Liberals, who urged Canadians to make it a ballot-box issue, and the Conservatives, who failed to embrace the level of grassroots worry over climate.

Farmers need to pay attention. The electorate – those who are concerned about climate change – are the same people who buy their products. And farmers are vulnerable to climate change criticism from extremists, despite having an excellent story to tell about pro-environment programs they’ve established, like Ontario’s Environmental Farm Plan.

However, like details about concerns in the west over natural resources, their story isn’t being told broadly.

Now’s the time.

Consumers need to understand Canadian farmers’ crucial role in environmental stewardship and sustainability. They need to hear about their contributions to greenhouse gas production and climate change. Consumers’ decision to support homegrown products can highly influence farmers’ livelihood and sustainability, not to mention price. 

That means education is an important part of the way forward, and something that farmers, regardless of their political stripes, can collectively get behind. Because it’s collective action will be needed to not only make the federal government work, but to make consumers realize Canadian agriculture is not an environmental liability.

As Ontario Federation of Agriculture president Keith Currie said, when Canadians cast their ballots Monday and chose a minority government, they sent a signal to politicians about the need for collaboration.

“In the agriculture industry,” he said, “we understand the value of working together towards a common goal, and we look to our elected officials to find common ground, especially when it comes to supporting the economic powerhouse that is Canadian agriculture.”

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to The Observer's online community. Pseudonyms are not permitted. By submitting a comment, you accept that The Observer has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner The Observer chooses. Please note that The Observer does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our submission guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

We're looking for opinions that count.

Yours. Join in the conversation, provide another viewpoint, change minds with your perspective.


Spending on transit, bike lanes unlikely to pay any dividends

There’s an “if you build it, they will come” mentality to both transit and so-called active transportation (walking, biking) schemes in Waterloo Region. That’s...

January doldrums ideal for pondering the end of the world

January already got you down? It might get worse before it gets better, at least if you subscribe to the pseudoscience – and...

Downed planes are collateral damage

One of the main causes of death for airline passengers in recent decades is being shot down by somebody’s military. Not the very...

Iran likely to play the long game

If the Iranians played the game the same way that Donald Trump does, then their revenge for the American assassination of Iran’s leading general,...

So what’s wrong with a $4 turkey?

Afriend of mine – let’s call her Tara, because that’s her name – visited relatives in Michigan over the Christmas holidays, and noticed the...

Major agricultural trends for 2020 taking root locally

Major agricultural trends being predicted this year for all of Canada are taking root here in the region. Although it’s months before crop producers...

Think of posterity and posteriors when tying flies

This week, I have been making an effort to tie at least one pike fly every day so that when the spring season...

The psychology of ice fishing

A lot of people think a person has to be crazy to go ice fishing. After all, what you are doing is deliberately...

That you have a phone number can be traced to the measles

Q.  How did an epidemic of measles lead to the introduction of phone numbers? A.  At one time, all phone calls...

Size not an issue, as moquitoes top list of deadliest predators

Q.  Which of the following is the deadliest predator of people on the planet?  A. sharks   B. lions and other big cats   C. human...
- Advertisement -