2.7 C
Tuesday, February 25, 2020
Connecting Our Communities

Unused bike lanes offer no benefits, waste tax money


News Briefs

Woolwich nixes traffic islands Displeased with the troublesome pedestrian islands installed during the Region of Waterloo’s reconstruction of Church Street...

20-year-old agreement causes a stir

An Elmira environmentalist’s “smoking gun” appears to be shooting blanks. Al Marshall, a long-time critic of cleanup efforts at...

Forks up to farmers on well-timed Agriculture Day

February is not the most obvious time to celebrate agriculture in Canada. But that’s...

Need for dementia research will only keep growing

Along with financial insecurity due to inadequate pensions, Canadians have health issues to worry about as society ages...


overcast clouds
2.7 ° C
4 °
0.6 °
86 %
90 %
7 °
7 °
-4 °
-6 °
-8 °

The same provincial government that has cut transfers to Woolwich Township by $110,000 is able to turn around and find $4 million for bicycle lanes in the region, projects that have pretty much no value to the public.

When you factor in the stated goal of reducing pollution, every dime spent on cycling is essentially wasted – more bike lanes will do nothing to get people out of their cars, or even buses.

That Woolwich had its Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund grant cut isn’t necessarily a bad thing. That’s if the province were moving to control its runaway spending, but that’s not case – the Wynne government continues to mismanage provincial coffers. The Woolwich cut is relatively minor in comparison to the tens of billions Wynne is wasting in an effort to be re-elected next year – no amount of your money is too much for that goal.

But the cycling initiatives are indicative of the same kind of wishful thinking that applies to many of its social/nanny state experiments, all the way up to pushing public transit in areas where large expenditures  make little sense – the $4 million given to Waterloo Region for cycling pales in comparison to the waste on light rail here, for instance.

Still, the rush to appear “progressive” when it comes to cycling and bike lanes is not borne out by the numbers – Statistics Canada reports that about one per cent of people in the region use bikes to commute to work, a number that is little more than a rounding error. The eye test shows that even few kids, typically the largest user group, are opting to use their bikes to get around. You need only see the predominance of parents dropping off their children at school to see where the trend is headed.

Some people stick with biking as a recreational pursuit later in life. A handful get out of the student years still using a bike to get around. Trying to boost those numbers is the rationale for many so-called active transportation plans, to little avail.

We know cycling is good for us in that it provides exercise, and if more of us did it there would be a net benefit to the environment, taking us out of our cars in favour of non-polluting transportation. If we were more like Europeans, for instance, we’d be better off for it.

There are, however, a long list of reasons why that’s not the case, safety being a huge issue.

In Europe, denser cities make getting around by foot and by bike much easier, as does the more temperate climate. The price of cars and fuel make alternatives more desirable. Crowding means smaller is better when it comes to a vehicle for getting around. Theirs is a culture accustomed to walking, biking and public transit.

Because of sprawl and car-centric design, our communities are largely unfriendly to pedestrian and bicycle traffic. We walk and bike less often here, largely because it’s neither safe nor convenient to do so. And that’s not just perception: our car-centric planning in North America makes it much safer to travel by car than by foot or bicycle.

Here, putting money into cycling simply does not make economic sense. That goes double where government is concerned, as there’s every reason to believe projects will cost much more than they should, and will be rife with errors. Worse still, the cost overruns, deficiencies and poor usage will be hidden from the public.

Unless success – low cost, high usage – can be guaranteed, each is just one more needless and wasteful pet project.

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to The Observer's online community. Pseudonyms are not permitted. By submitting a comment, you accept that The Observer has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner The Observer chooses. Please note that The Observer does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our submission guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.


Under the auctioneer’s gavel to provide help Down Under

After seeing the devastation from the Australian wildfires, a local art collector sold the first painting she ever bought on Saturday to help raise money for relief efforts there. Nancy...

In Print. Online. In Pictures. In Depth.

You obviously love community journalism. Thanks for visiting today. If you have a great local story, let us know.

EDSS performers take Broadway under the sea

By Steve Kannon skannon@woolwichobserver.com The tropics, under the sea or otherwise, seem like a much better place...

Sugar Kings win three games, clinch first place

In need of just one more win to clinch first place in the Midwestern Conference, the Elmira Sugar Kings claimed all three games...

U.S. edges out Canada in national para hockey battle

In the natural on-ice rivalry between Canada and the U.S., the American para hockey team has had the advantage in recent years. That...
- Advertisement -