8.9 C
Elmira
Sunday, May 31, 2020
Their View / Opinion

Why $252 million for farming and food is only a start

On Tuesday, about an hour after the federal government announced a $252-million, pandemic-related aid package for Canadian farmers, Ontario’s minister of agriculture, food and rural affairs, Ernie Hardeman issued an editorial praising farmers.

His message was not connected to the federal announcement, but it made an important point.

“During these unprecedented times, Ontarians have been reassured by the fact that our agri-food sector continues to bring food to our tables,” he said. “Everyone working hard to make that happen deserves our utmost thanks. From transporting food, to making sure grocery store shelves are full, to planting this season’s crops – you are an inspiration to us all.”

He couldn’t be more right. While at various times we’ve wanted for some commodities, for the most part, our food needs have been met by our farming and processing sector.

The same day, University of Guelph farm and food system economists Mike von Massow and Alfons Weeksink noted in an essay about food and the pandemic, we also have cheap food.

“It doesn’t always feel like it, but Canadians spend among the lowest proportion of our income on food in the world,” they say.

Indeed, if you live in a remote community, or if you’re relying on a food bank now, statistics be damned. We have a huge problem with food access equality.

But in any case, farmers keep on producing, even when the chips are down. Over the past two years, they’ve been hit with tumbling prices, terrible weather conditions for planting and harvest, and a brutal trade war. Their response? Ask for help and keep on producing.

Now, they’re victims of their own determination.

Driven to the brink by the COVID-19 pandemic, they have finally said they can’t take it anymore. The Canadian Federation of Agriculture says farmers are going to lose $2.6 billion this year because markets for their products have changed so drastically. Estimates from various industry analysis say Canada could lose 15 per cent or more of its farmers.

And at a time when we are legitimately worrying about our domestic food supply, this is unthinkable. We should be helping farmers produce more, not less.

For all these reasons, I have to believe that Tuesday’s federal announcement of disaster relief for farmers was an important start – but only a start.

First, it was targeted almost exclusively to the livestock sector. There’s no question those producers certainly need the money, as does the processing sector that supports them.

But even then, the federal money only covers a fraction of the losses they’re predicting. Pork producers alone say they are going to lose $675 million this year. And the beef industry has been in turmoil for months. Farmers don’t expect Ottawa to fully cover their losses. But they are definitely looking for something more helpful.

And for the crop sector … well, the 28,000-member Grain Farmers of Ontario organization minced no words in this response to the federal announcement from its chair, Markus Haerle.

“Grain farmers in Ontario are facing an unprecedented $550 million in lost revenues,” he said. “Over 67 per cent of our farmer-members are worried about their farms’ ability to survive this crisis and its aftermath. The federal government has ‘targeted’ groups without understanding the full picture. Our Prime Minister and his government are asking grain farmers to bear the costs of everyone having enough to eat.”

So we can only assume that federal support for other industry segments, such as grain farmers, is on its way. It must be. The agriculture industry is broad, complex and couldn’t be more vital to society. The government has opened the vault for other groups, and now’s the time to do so for farmers, too.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to The Observer's online community. Pseudonyms are not permitted. By submitting a comment, you accept that The Observer has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner The Observer chooses. Please note that The Observer does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our submission guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

We're looking for opinions that count.

Yours. Join in the conversation, provide another viewpoint, change minds with your perspective.

OUR COLUMNISTS

Will the public good be part of the equation in post-COVID recovery?

Short-term thinkers as a rule, most of us are firmly ensconced in a reality shaped by COVID-19. Understandably, the current crisis and...

Now we’re lining up to get overcharged for booze

The sustained lineups in front of LCBO stores tell us booze is deemed essential through the coronavirus pandemic, the employees there frontline...

Hong Kong: a story of what went wrong

“We are the meat on the chopping board,” said Martin Lee, founder of Hong Kong’s Democratic Party. “They have set a precedent...

Basic income: a done deal?

The First World War speeded up the emancipation of women; the Second World War led to the creation of welfare states in...

Still too many close calls and safety issues for farmers

The COVID-19 pandemic fallout – in particular, the food shortages we’ve experienced in some commodities, due to either increased demand or decreased...

Frontline food workers to Ontario: We’re here for you

We’re pretty attached to our neighbourhood butcher. He’s always been renowned for quality, let alone service and friendliness. And...

Better days are just around the corner

There are no grouse in the woods where I now let my pup run – and that is why I choose to...

Dealing with the implications of a near-tragedy

The other day, a good friend of mine called to tell me about an unfortunate thing that happened to him. He was...

They may have a bad reputation, but wasps are useful critters

Q.  As far back as the fourth century B.C., Aristotle lamented the shortcomings of Greece’s young people, saying “They think they know...

Love is a drug, with real medicinal benefits

Q.  Have you heard talk about a “love medicine”?  Is it a new wonder drug? A.  It’s certainly wonderful...
- Advertisement -