-7.1 C
Elmira
Saturday, February 22, 2020
Connecting Our Communities

Neighbours want no part of Elmira apartment complex

Plan calls for four-storey, 21-unit rental building at 44-46 Church St. W.

TRENDING

News Briefs

Woolwich nixes traffic islands Displeased with the troublesome pedestrian islands installed during the Region of Waterloo’s reconstruction of Church Street...

20-year-old agreement causes a stir

An Elmira environmentalist’s “smoking gun” appears to be shooting blanks. Al Marshall, a long-time critic of cleanup efforts at...

Forks up to farmers on well-timed Agriculture Day

February is not the most obvious time to celebrate agriculture in Canada. But that’s...

EDSS student wins $5,000 scholarship to pursue his university education

Max Campbell’s dreams of perhaps one day making it to space got a down-to-Earth boost last week in the...

THIS WEEK

Elmira
clear sky
-7.1 ° C
-3.9 °
-11 °
66 %
2.6kmh
1 %
Sat
2 °
Sun
5 °
Mon
6 °
Tue
4 °
Wed
7 °

On the heels of opposition to an Ernst Street condominium proposal, another group of Elmira residents were equally unwelcoming to plans for a four-storey, 21-unit apartment building on Church Street West.

Wayne Martin and Rick Brubacher are seeking township approval for a rental building on what is now two properties located at 44 and 46 Church St. W. The former contains an older house that’s been converted to a triplex, while the latter is now a vacant lot after the single-family home there was demolished.

The plan presented to Woolwich council Tuesday night calls for one- and two-bedroom units to be offered for rent, said Megan Gereghty, a GSP Group planner representing the property owners.

To proceed, the developer will need official plan and zoning amendments from the township. Beyond that, the proposal asks for a number of site-specific changes, from much lower setbacks from the roadway to fewer parking spots than would normally be required. The density on the 0.42-acre (0.17-hectare) site would have to increase to twice the currently permitted level – to 124 units per hectare from 60.

“We think they’re appropriate for this site,” said Gereghty of the special provisions.

Neighbours were not of the same mind, raising concerns about traffic, parking, loss of privacy and incompatibilities with the existing surroundings.

The size of the building would not be in keeping with the neighbourhood, said Walter Ireson, who lives immediately next door at 42 Church St. W.

The proposed building would dwarf his home, keeping the yard in shade and eliminating privacy with a string of balconies looking out over his property, he added.

“When I get up in the morning … without raising my voice, I’ll be able to say ‘good morning’ to my neighbours,” he said.

He and other neighbours raised concerns about the grading on the property, which would require retaining walls and fences that would extend up to 15 feet high, cutting of the views of neighbouring properties that back on to the site.

Traffic is already an issue, Ireson added. The build-out of the large Lunor Subdivision to the west will make it worse.

Richard Trapp, who owns the property at 10 Snyder Ave. S., echoed concerns about traffic and parking.

“It’s already very, very difficult down there,” he said, noting the project isn’t a good fit, much like the Ernst Street building discussed earlier in the evening.

“These are projects that are trying to fit into the neighbourhood and that really aren’t appropriate,” he said.

“They’re too big. They just don’t fit.”

Picking up on the traffic concerns, Coun. Patrick Merlihan questioned the lack of a traffic study looking at the impact of the new apartment building.

Traffic volumes even now a problem on Church Street heading into the downtown core, he said, noting parking is at a premium already, though the applicant is suggesting visitors and residents would find on-street parking.

The June 25 session was for information purposes, with no decisions made. Councillors will await full public comment and a recommendation report from planning staff before voting on the merits of the proposal.

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to The Observer's online community. Pseudonyms are not permitted. By submitting a comment, you accept that The Observer has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner The Observer chooses. Please note that The Observer does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our submission guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.

LIVING HERE

Under the auctioneer’s gavel to provide help Down Under

After seeing the devastation from the Australian wildfires, a local art collector sold the first painting she ever bought on Saturday to help raise money for relief efforts there. Nancy...

In Print. Online. In Pictures. In Depth.

You obviously love community journalism. Thanks for visiting today. If you have a great local story, let us know.

U.S. edges out Canada in national para hockey battle

In the natural on-ice rivalry between Canada and the U.S., the American para hockey team has had the advantage in recent years. That...

Jacks take 3-2 series lead into deciding weekend vs. New Hamburg

The Wellesley Applejacks are up 3-2 in their best-of-seven series against the New Hamburg Firebirds, having claimed two of this week’s three games in...

EDSS performers take Broadway under the sea

By Steve Kannon skannon@woolwichobserver.com The tropics, under the sea or otherwise, seem like a much better place...
- Advertisement -