3.5 C
Monday, February 24, 2020
Connecting Our Communities

Stop tinkering and make real changes to poor spending habits


News Briefs

Woolwich nixes traffic islands Displeased with the troublesome pedestrian islands installed during the Region of Waterloo’s reconstruction of Church Street...

20-year-old agreement causes a stir

An Elmira environmentalist’s “smoking gun” appears to be shooting blanks. Al Marshall, a long-time critic of cleanup efforts at...

Forks up to farmers on well-timed Agriculture Day

February is not the most obvious time to celebrate agriculture in Canada. But that’s...

Need for dementia research will only keep growing

Along with financial insecurity due to inadequate pensions, Canadians have health issues to worry about as society ages...


clear sky
3.5 ° C
7.8 °
-0.6 °
69 %
1 %
11 °
3 °
8 °
2 °
-4 °

Some tinkering at the margins aside, there’s been very little talk of saving money, and even less about value for taxpayers and doing right by residents as Woolwich councillors went through four weeks of special budget meetings.

There was, however, some movement in that direction last week, with council putting off a final vote on the 2019 budget pending some adjustments. Not, of course, that there will be a wholesale review of how spending got out of hand in the last decade or so.

One useful suggestion involves leaving vacant the economic development job while the incumbent is on maternity leave, with a potential savings of some $115,000 – equivalent to a one per cent tax hike. For those councillors worried that the money would have to go back into the budget next year following the incumbent’s return, there was also a suggestion the dollars be earmarked for the operating contingency fund, the better to strip out some of the padding elsewhere in the budget.

If, as is likely, the one-year hiatus from the services reveals the function isn’t a good value proposition for the residents of Woolwich, then council will have some useful data to begin eliminating the position, an overdue review of the township’s unsupported and unjustified expansion in management staff size and costs

Moreover, the finagling should serve as an eye-opening experience about both the long history of weak justifications for spending choices and the fact that the go-to move is to recommend cuts that hurt the public, not the ever-bloating bureaucracy.

There were hints of the standard refrain that any changes to the budget – itself presented as if from Mount Sinai – would require cuts to frontline service; ideally, councillors intent on doing jobs pay no heed to that. There’s plenty of room to cut percentages out of the budget without any effect on actual services to the public and zero impact on infrastructure projects.

Woolwich Township is a small organization. If the senior management can’t easily identify the unneeded, unwanted and unworthy, council has a pretty good idea where to start with changes.

Changes can’t be made willy-nilly, but the township’s business just isn’t that complicated. Certainly not as complicated at the budget process tries to make it, both for councillors and the public. The convoluted process is intentional, with the goal of forcing councillors to simply trust that what staff has prepared is both suitable and efficient. Not everyone on council is hoodwinked, but there is perhaps too much Kool-Aid on the menu.

Fighting on the side of what’s right – i.e. the public interest and the long-term health of the township – mindful councillors know what they’re up against and where changes have to be made in order to make local government more responsive to those who really matter.

Woolwich has certainly been suffering from bureaucratic bloat, particularly in the last decade, with most of the new positions adding no value to the residents of the township.

Directing staff to make cuts rather than simply going back to the tax well would set a good precedent, forcing them to look at needless spending. Likewise, Woolwich needs to reel in its increasing expenditures – up 92 per cent in the last decade – which have continued to climb as the township helped itself to the assessment growth and other financial windfalls, taking and not giving anything back to the residents who suffer from the many negatives of growth.

Easy cuts with no impact on residents will provide plenty of extra revenue that can applied to the township’s infrastructure deficit. Reduced spending on the operating side will allow the municipality to focus on the priorities, hard services essential to the community.

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to The Observer's online community. Pseudonyms are not permitted. By submitting a comment, you accept that The Observer has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner The Observer chooses. Please note that The Observer does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our submission guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.


Under the auctioneer’s gavel to provide help Down Under

After seeing the devastation from the Australian wildfires, a local art collector sold the first painting she ever bought on Saturday to help raise money for relief efforts there. Nancy...

In Print. Online. In Pictures. In Depth.

You obviously love community journalism. Thanks for visiting today. If you have a great local story, let us know.

EDSS performers take Broadway under the sea

By Steve Kannon skannon@woolwichobserver.com The tropics, under the sea or otherwise, seem like a much better place...

U.S. edges out Canada in national para hockey battle

In the natural on-ice rivalry between Canada and the U.S., the American para hockey team has had the advantage in recent years. That...

Sugar Kings win three games, clinch first place

In need of just one more win to clinch first place in the Midwestern Conference, the Elmira Sugar Kings claimed all three games...
- Advertisement -